Blogging thru On the Incarnation: Athanasius’ Cosmology (part 4)

This is part 4 of the series blogging through the book On the Incarnation by Athanasius. You might want to start with part 1 and work your way through the series.

On Feb 14, 1990, Voyager 1 sent back its famous image of the “pale blue dot”, capturing how large and vast the universe is. This was taken some 3.7 billion miles from the sun as the probe left our solar system. 1 However, the idea that the universe was larger than our solar system, something we take for granted as a well established fact, was still a debated idea until Jan 1, 1925.2

When we affirm that the heavens declare the glory of God, we have a very different mental model and understanding of these heavens than Athanasius and his contemporaries did living in the fourth century. However, that doesn’t mean that in each age the creation doesn’t “make known, and witness to, the Father of the Word, Who is the Lord and Maker of these [things]” 3

In noting that “it is first necessary to speak about the creation of the universe and its Maker”, Athanasius quickly affirms creation ex nihilo, an act performed by the Father through the Word.

God is not weak, but from nothing and having absolutely no existence God brought the universe into being through the Word 3

On the Incarnation chap 3

In On the Incarnation, Athanasius explores creation as it relates to the incarnation and the cross. A topic that we will explore later in this series. In Against the Gentiles the emphasis is on how creation declares a Creator. It is in this earlier work that we get a brief description of how Athanasius understands the universe. That will be the focus on this particular entry in the blogging series.

For Athanasius, as noted already, the model of the universe was very different from what we know today. It would be incredibly smaller, at least from our point of view. In a prior series we explored ancient cosmology and the major characteristics from the point of view of a person living in the fourth century5

Continue reading

Blogging thru On the Incarnation: Good is, Evil is not (part 3)

This is part 3 of the series blogging through the book On the Incarnation by Athanasius. You might want to start with part 1 and work your way through the series.

Having established the proper state of mankind, Athanasius traces the origin and history of evil all the way to its worse form, which for him is idolatry. Don’t worry, we won’t get too bogged down in all of the arguments or the refutations that Athanasius offers against idols.

In Against the Gentiles, he starts off chapter 2 saying:

In the beginning wickedness did not exist. 1

With these words Athanasius takes us back to the Genesis account and creation.

In the early part of On the Incarnation, Athanasius will tell us that it will “be necessary to speak about the creation of the universe” in order to understand why Christ came in bodily form. In that work he will examine more closely the Fall and its impacts. Here, in Against the Gentiles, he delves into how man left the proper state and brought about evil with broader brush strokes.

But men later on began to contrive [wickedness] and to elaborate it to their own hurt. Whence also they devised the invention of idols, treating what was not as though it were. 

Describing God as “good and exceedingly noble”, Athanasius will later say (in chapter 4):

Continue reading

Blogging thru On the Incarnation: The Prequel (part 2)

This is part 2  of the series blogging through the book On the Incarnation by Athanasius. You might want to start with part 1 and work your way through the series.

The opening statements of the first chapter in On The Incarnation refer to a prior work of Athanasius. That work is Against the Gentiles.

In what preceded we have sufficiently treated a few points from many, regarding the error of the Gentiles concerning idols and their superstition, how their invention was from the beginning, and that out of wickedness human beings devised for themselves the worship of idols.

On the INcarnation chap 11

The translator Behr suggests that “[both works] need to be considered together, for the first work sets up the problem that the second resolves.”2 Therefore, before reading On the Incarnation, I took the time to read Against the Gentiles.

In Against the Gentiles, Athanasius explores how idolatry came into existence and then spends a great portion of the work refuting it in all of its forms. If I were to summarize the work, Against the Gentiles is a full length treatment of the concepts laid out in Romans 1:18-28. Athanasius will start by explaining the power all people have to direct their attention to God. He will then show that each person knows God but suppresses the truth that is available. He then traces the history of futility as mankind traded the Creator for the created. An exchange that leads down a path deeper and deeper into darkness, accepting various forms of idolatry and adopting sinful behaviors. He will also point to our need to avail ourselves of the ability we have to turn back to God. Throughout the work, Athanasius focuses on the rationality that exists in mankind. Therefore he dedicates part of the work toward defending the existence of the soul, for him the seat of rationality. He concludes by showing that Nature reveals a Creator.

Continue reading